Archistry

Survivability by Design™ since 2006

  • Home
  • About
    • Who Is Andrew?
    • C2T System™
    • The Agile Security System™
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Archistry Daily / Zorked: what to do when you’re standing at that infernal fork in the road

March 9, 2019

Zorked: what to do when you’re standing at that infernal fork in the road

Now, many of you probably won’t remember a game called Zork, or the whole slew of text-based Infocomm adventure game titles (of which I owned – legitimately – several). And the one that started them all was Zork.

At some point, you would come to a fork in the road, and you’d have to make a decision. The decision you made could find you impaled by an ogre or scooping up treasure by the basketful.

…not so different than IRL as a security leader, really.

So today, I want to talk about that damn fork in the road. And how to deal with that fork in the road is pretty important to figure out if you want to maintain your sanity, maintain an average stress level and, oh, yeah, do that thing you’re supposed to be doing: keeping the organization cutting you paychecks up and running.

We face that fork in the road every day. Sometimes it’s a big fork, and sometimes it’s small.

Most of the time, we’re pretty busy, so we do the mental version of a coin toss and pick one. And we pick whatever choice we have because we have faith in our own abilities to deal with whatever comes our way.

Unfortunately, sometimes that faith and confidence is a bit misplaced…

…and sometimes, the implications of that mental coin toss are much bigger than we’d ever imagined.

If you take a step back and look at ye olde adventurer standing at that fork in the road as someone other than you, what you’ll find is that ultimately, the adventurer wouldn’t be standing at that particular fork in the road if they didn’t have a problem.

And by taking either the left or the right fork, they’re either consciously or unconsciously committing to a particular strategy to solve that problem.

In the classic Frost poem, “The Road Not Taken,” you get a glimpse of what we’re talking about here.  Having taken “the other, just as fair,” the narrator comes to the crux of the poem  which most people don’t seem to remember:

“Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.”

What they’re talking about here are the implications of taking one path vs. another. And at each junction, there are a new set of implications, and a new set of constraints and capabilities you might have that you didn’t have when you, yourself as a security leader, decided to take “the other, just as fair.”

My question to you is by what means did you determine the right course of action?

How did you actually evaluate the alternatives before you?

Against what outcomes or ultimate aims were you stacking the pros and cons of each?

…or did you, out of necessity, do the mental coin toss and make a decision – any decision – so you could get on to the next one…

…and the next one

…and the next one

…and the next one

…and ultimately realize that you weren’t where you’d intended to be after all—regardless or not  being impaired by an orc.

You see, as a security leader, how you make those decisions is not only critical to you, but it’s critical to your team and the organization you protect.

You need to make the best decisions, not with the information available to you, but with the INSIGHTS available to you having actually evaluated each of the potential options in depth so that you understand the implications of “the first” vs. “the other, just as fair.”

Are you doing this today?

If you’re not, then you’re not really thinking strategically, and you’re likely to make decisions that are not likely to get you where you want to be—or, at least, with as much gold in your pocket.

There’s a pretty straightforward way to avoid this kind of surprise and endless angst over whether if you’d taken “the first” vs. “the other, just as fair” would’ve lead you to a much more desirable “all the difference” than you’re living right now.

And it’s a technique I teach not only in our flagship training program, but also as part of the Security Leadership coaching program—if you need it.

Or, it’s a technique that I apply during our 1:1 sessions to help you make sure you’ve considered all the options and their implications if you need an answer RIGHT NOW, and you don’t have time for the theory.

What I know from personal experience is that this is a pretty fundamental technique that can make a profound difference in both your professional and your personal life.

So, if you either a) want to know how to REALLY make sure you make the best decisions you can given the information you have

OR

b) you just want access to a sounding board that can help you think through the options for your team, for your security strategy or for your own career…

Then you still have time to get in to the Security Leadership coaching program at a discount rate by going here to set up your application call:

https://archistry.com/go/SecurityLeader.

Don’t get Zorked. Make better choices.

What do you say?

 

ast
—
Andrew S. Townley
Archistry Chief Executive

Article by Andrew Townley / Archistry Daily / Decisions, Frost, Strategic Thinking, The Road Not Taken, Zork

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Want to get DAILY email tips on how to build a more effective security program so you can prove your security investments deliver value to the business?

You can always unsubscribe at any time, and we won't sell your data to third parties.

About Us

Archistry works with you to ensure what you want to achieve actually gets done, linking strategy, risk, governance and compliance to enable sustained exceptional performance Read More…

Testimonials

Andrew is a highly skilled and experienced information systems architect and consultant, which in my view is a rare thing. He is innovative in his thinking and merits the title of 'thought leader' in his specialist domains of knowledge—in particular the management of risk. Andrew has embraced SABSA as a framework and, in doing so, has been a significant contributor to extending the SABSA body of knowledge."

— John Sherwood, Chief SABSA Architect

"Fabulous person to work with. Very engaging and insightful. Extremely good technical knowledge with ability to relate concepts together and overcome differing opinions. Makes things work."

— Kevin Howe-Patterson, Chief Architect, Nortel - Wireless Data Services

"Andrew was able to bring clarity and great depth of knowledge to the table. His breadth of thinking and understanding of the business and technical issues along with a clear and effective communication style were of great benefit in moving the process forward towards a successful conclusion."

— Doug Reynolds, Product Manager, MobileAware

"Andrew is a fabulous consultant and presenter that you simply enjoy listening to, as he manages to develop highly sophisticated subjects in very understandable way. His experience is actually surprising and his thoughts leave you without considerable arguments for any doubts in the subjects he covers."

— Biljana Cerin, Director, Information Security and Compliance

Recent Posts

  • If you want better security, you’d better have a better security architecture
  • The ultimate security song to keep you focused on what you’re doing
  • Security heroes
  • There’s always a people problem
  • Putting your data flow diagrams out to pasture…for good

Looking for something else?

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Copyright © 2006-2025 Archistry Incorporated or its affiliates

"Archistry", the stained glass window logo, "Pragmantix" and the Pragmantix™ logo, "Archistry Execution Framework (AEF)", "Archistry Execution Framework, Cybersecurity Edition (ACS)", "The Agile Security System", "The Agile Business System", "Baseline Perspectives", "Architecture Wall", "Archistry Execution Engine", "Renegade Security", "Renegade Security System", "Security Value Delivery System (SVDS)" "Collapse-to-Traction", "Collapse-to-Traction System", "Adaptive Trust & Governance Model (ATGM)", and "Adaptive Trust & Governance Model for Organizations (ATGM4O)" are trademarks of Archistry Incorporated or its affiliates.